I don't mean for it to limit the viewer in how they watch your vids or anyone elses but rather give ways to help people interpret vids. That doesn't mean you can't view the vid on different levels or in a different way.
::nods:: I understand that you didn't mean the limitation, however I sorta feel that comments by the vidder themselves will necessarily affect how one views their vids, so I hesitate (myself, personally) to write meta to that effect. I hesitate to say that "this is how one must interpret a vid".
Case in point, if one watches a vid and interprets it in a totally different way than the vidder meant it, I view that interpretation as just as valid as the "true" purpose of the vid as concieved by the vidder, despite any statement by the vidder themselves that it's "wrong".
Perhaps tho I'm misunderstood tho...'cause then again, I can kinda see how perhaps laying out "patterns" of possible viewership of vids might be useful. Like, "this is the patterns of a reaction shot" or "this usually means that the vidder is trying to compare two things", like that?
no subject
::nods:: I understand that you didn't mean the limitation, however I sorta feel that comments by the vidder themselves will necessarily affect how one views their vids, so I hesitate (myself, personally) to write meta to that effect. I hesitate to say that "this is how one must interpret a vid".
Case in point, if one watches a vid and interprets it in a totally different way than the vidder meant it, I view that interpretation as just as valid as the "true" purpose of the vid as concieved by the vidder, despite any statement by the vidder themselves that it's "wrong".
Perhaps tho I'm misunderstood tho...'cause then again, I can kinda see how perhaps laying out "patterns" of possible viewership of vids might be useful. Like, "this is the patterns of a reaction shot" or "this usually means that the vidder is trying to compare two things", like that?